Monday, 10 August 2009

Number 403, 10 August 2009. Coming To America To Get William Casey And John Mitchell For Using Very Young Rent Boys!

Post number 403

Allegedly, There was a Talmudic Jewish 3+1 sponsored/backed woman who also used the services of Craig Spence’s (Google him!) very young rent boys along with the former Attorney General John Mitchell, and former CIA Director William Casey, who also used Spence’s very young rent boys in Washington DC.

She was/is Phyllis Schlafly, the Washington political activist/propagandist. While the revolting and stomach churning use of rent boys by the men, Mitchell and Casey can be disgustingly comprehended, one cannot but wonder how on earth did Ms Schlafly use very young rent boys, sexually? They could not have been sexually active to have given her a few good hard ones over the photo copier. What did she do with them?

Can readers can get imaginations really wild and report possibilities on Facebook?

US laws have always been very lax on child pornography. As recently as the 1990s, private possession of child pornography was legal in 44 of the 50 states of the US, despite the fact that all material were illegally produced!

The FBI (Talmudic Jewish Neo Nazi paedomason propped) launched 1,125 enquiries in 1999 related to internet – related child pornography. Judge Donald Molloy (Talmudic Jewish follower/believer or the Talmud’s 3+1 prophecies), probably of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeal (Talmudic Jewish Neo Nazi, 3+1 related/based/borne) stated that the First Amendment BARS the government (Talmudic Jewish 3+1 based/related/borne) from criminalising the generation of “images of fictitious children engaged in imaginary but explicit sexual conduct”.

David McGowan (full article below) records details of computer generated images of children (using advanced graphics), and comparison of these with real photos/videos of children used in child sexual abuse. These “tricks” used by the Talmudic Jewish (3+1 borne etc) government (Obama’s being no exception) are just ploys to justify state sponsored/administered child abuse (as per the Talmud’s cheating of the said 3+1 prophecies), and make it literally impossible to prosecute the police, the Talmudic press, the SS, councils, and other positions of higher authority.

The major child porn market (Talmudic Jewish 3+1) in the early 1990s was US$3 billion, and the US market was reported to be growing.

Extrapolated to 2009, how much is the US market worth now? How much have the European, Asian, African, the American continent, and Australian markets grown? As much as arms dealing, legal and contraband? We are trying to draw your attention to the reality of 3+1 Jewish god – approved child sexual abuse is another weapon in the armoury of the Talmudic Jewish Neo Nazi, Israel propping, NWO establishment for total domination of the world. This category of weaponry is the of the same calibre as war on terror (Islam as the substitute for the Soviet Union and the Eastern Block, or the Warsaw Pact), the AIDS campaign, vaccination, human rights campaigns or rather accusations, GM food, and the like.

You disarm the Talmudic Jewish world establishment of their 3+1 Jewish god – approved weapon, and you will have demolished the remainder of the establishment, weapons and all. In buildings, you have substructure which is the foundation. Then, you have superstructure, which are the bits sticking up above the ground. Child sexual abuse as a weapon is the substructure or foundation work. You fracture it, the super structure will crumbling down.

To fracture the substructure, or Talmudic god – approved 3+1 child abuse, I have recommended (first person singular is used, because some team members here don’t agree with using business as a tool) business. Our product/idea is selling a form of 3+1 as a protest, and as a rejection of the Talmudic 3+1 core belief that the rest of us are subhuman. That’s ridiculous. We non Jews are not subhuman. If the world voted (which we will), we will outnumber the Talmudic Jews. So there!

Disney’s (paedpophiles) Patrick J. Naughton (Google him) who benefited from Disney packaged child porn films was arrested and charged on child porn charges. Where is Patrick now? Is he alive? Now that this post is out, will he be killed by the establishment so that we don’t hunt him down, wearing our version of 3+1 on our clothes, bling, school bags, and even school desks and chairs? We will find him and try him in one of our RICE courts.

In the 90s, some 200,000 US children disappeared without a trace. Talmudic Jews (3+1) don’t mind that at all. In fact, they were and are pleased at the ‘population control’. After all, revised Talmudic 3+1 god – approved allowable world population is earmarked at around 1 billion us ‘subhuman’ to serve our ‘masters’, the Jews. Throw in unjustified illegal wars (5 million deaths in the Congo plus those in Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan,….), and the Talmudic Jews are doing a pretty good job of getting rid of some us. Add to other weapons, Fluoridation (a Nazi tool) and Donald Rumsfeld’s Aspartame, and more will be made dumber (sheeple) first, and then die.

‘THEY’ have figured it all out, haven’t they? The bad news for ‘THEM’ is that we have figured it all out, too, and have sat out to do something about it.

Who is in their think tank? Ram Emanuel, David Axlerod (both Jews and in Obama’s inner circle), Wolfowitz, Perl, Kissinger, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Thatcher, and further down the line, Bolton, Marilyn (Tony) Blair, Gordon Brown, Lord Mandelson? They are not exactly ‘unapproachable’ by a great number of our people donning our versions of 3+1 and get to the bottoms of things…

In the 90s, 90% of US teenage prison population were victims of child abuse! They alone must have consumed a great chunk of the Police and FBI’s time and other resources. If trends are similar in Britain, then is it small wonder that we never have enough police men and women, and that we boast the maximum numbers of CCTC cameras in the world (countries)? In addition, we are threatened with DNA profiling, biometric identities, etc. Our children are raped, sold as sex objects, tortured, killed, and those alive are driven to commit crime. Then turn around and mark all the adult portion of the 60 million of us with all sorts of Police State enforcements. Oh, those Talmudic Jews with their god, approving 3+1 and all the rest of it. You’ve got to give them. They are a smart bunch.

We will let you read the article below by David McGowan so that you are enlightened about Woody Allen, Michael Jackson, and more. For now, we will just summarise a few other bits, starting with child prostitution:

In the 90s, there were 600,000 child prostitutes in the US and Canada. The global ‘business’ turnover operated by pimps (Talmudic Jewish based/borne/related 3+1) was US$5 billion per year.

Taliban Break: Are you reading this in Helmand, Lashkargaah, and elsewhere? Canada and the US are just two of the countries with troops, guns, bomber planes, road and military base building (not agriculture and mining) to help Afghanistan. They will be bringing you a few other ‘goodies’ published in this blog and Facebook. I would rather them leave Afghanistan now, along with NATO, the Poles, the Czechs, the Germans, the Italians, the Australians and all the rest. Do you not agree?

Add the 5 billion to the US$3 billion netted through the Talmudic Jewish blessed child sexual abuse, you get 8 billions from one source alone. This is the 1990s figure. How much is it 19 years later?! Add proceeds from arms dealings, GM food, vaccination, and other Talmudic Jewish – devised sources you can name in your part of the world.

Here is something big to finish the post with, compliments of Mr David McGowan:

This concerns both political parties in Washington DC, again in the 90s: Look into the case of Republican pawnbroker Craig Spence. He supplied very young rent boys to the elites of both parties. Among Spence’s clients were CIA Director William Casey, former Attorney General John Mitchell, and as mentioned at the onset, Phyllis Schlafly, the DC activist/propagandist. With the Attorney General having fun (sick) with young rent boys, no wonder, every body peddling child sexual abuse didn’t have a worry in the world while Mr Mitchell was in – charge of the US Judiciary.

“”””From The Pedophocracy By David McGowan
« on: February 18, 2009, 06:34:30 PM »;prev_next=prev#new
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2009, 06:36:31 PM »

The Pedophocracy, Part II:
... to Washington

The Center for an Informed America

David McGowan

August 2001
"Paul and Shirley Eberle wrote The Politics of Child Abuse, a book that accuses mothers, mental health professionals, and prosecutors of feeding children stories about sexual abuse. Since the book was published by Lyle Stuart in l986, the Eberles have been cited as experts in sexual abuse trials … What is startling about the Eberles' reputation as ground-breaking experts in the field is that their dubious credentials have not been widely challenged … Their publication, Finger, depicted scenes of bondage, S & M, and sexual activities involving urination and defecation. A young girl portrayed with a wide smile on her face sits on top of a man whose penis is inside of her; a woman has oral sex with a young boy in a drawing entitled ‘Memories of My Boyhood.'"
Ms. Magazine, December 1988

While the size and scope of these operations have grown rapidly in recent years, America has - as it turns out - always been a nation whose laws were friendly to purveyors of child pornography. It was just over twenty years ago - in 1978 - that the very first federal statute on child pornography was passed into law. While forbidding production and sale, the statute placed no restrictions at all on the possession or trade of such materials.

New laws enacted in 1984 forbid the trade of child pornography regardless of whether any money changed hands, though possession still remained legal. In fact, as recently as 1990, private possession of child pornography was legal in 44 of the 50 states, despite the inescapable fact that all such materials were, by necessity, illegally produced and/or illegally acquired.

Technology has for some time now played a key role in greatly expanding the availability of child pornography. The Polaroid camera, for example, eliminated the need for child pornographers to have access to complicit photo labs. Home video cameras did likewise for moving images. Personal computers, digital cameras, web cams, scanners, and - especially - the Internet, have vastly expanded the reach of child pornography networks.

In the age of the Internet, child pornography is a booming business. The Los Angeles Times noted in December of 1999 that: “the number of investigations for Internet-related child pornography is soaring. The FBI launched 1,125 such inquiries this year, more than twice as many as last year.” In the wake of this rising tide, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on December 17, 1999 which struck a serious blow to the prosecution of child pornography cases.

As the Times reported, the decision stipulated that “the government cannot prohibit computer-generated sexual images that only appear to be pictures of children.” A later report noted that appeals court judge Donald Molloy stated that the First Amendment bars the government from criminalizing the generation of “images of fictitious children engaged in imaginary but explicit sexual conduct.”

On January 22, 2001, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of the case. Should the presidential appointers on the high court choose to affirm the decision of the lower court, prosecution of child pornography cases will become all but impossible in all fifty states. Until that time, prosecutors are “barred from bringing virtual-child pornography cases in California and the eight other Western states within the jurisdiction of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.”

As critics have noted, graphics technology now available to the general public is so sophisticated that it is virtually impossible to determine if an image has been digitally altered, and if therefore any actual children were involved in the generation of the image. Justice Department lawyers argued that very point, noting that the “government may find it impossible in many cases to prove that a pornographic image is of a real child.”

Any good defense attorney could, in other words, raise reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of an image. It could in fact be argued that all such computer images “only appear to be pictures of children.” Computer images are not in fact photos, but are digital computer files that display as a facsimile of the original photo. A sound legal argument could be made that all digitally transferred and displayed child pornography is therefore legal, as it doesn't represent 'real children.'

That should come as great news to the international child pornography networks, given that the United States is their number-one market. According to investigative author Gordon Thomas, the majority of child pornography produced worldwide is targeted at the U.S., where by the early 1990s it was already a $3 billion a year business, and growing.

Thomas claims that - according to law enforcement figures - over 22 million copies of child pornography videos were sold or rented in the U.S. in 1991. He also writes that much of that pornographic material is produced here, where it is “part of the largest segment of movie making in the United States.” Jan Hollingsworth concurs with that figure, describing child pornography as: “A three-billion-dollar - per year - U.S. industry that grossed twice that worldwide. It [is] bigger than Disney. Much bigger.”

Speaking of Disney, Thomas notes that child porn videos are frequently trafficked internationally by deceptively packaging them as Disney videos. Strangely enough, the first man to benefit from the circuit court decision was Patrick J. Naughton. You may remember him as the executive with the Walt Disney Co. who ran one of the company's kid-friendly web sites. Naughton was arrested and later tried on child pornography charges.

He was convicted on December 16, just one day before the decision was handed down in the case before the circuit court. Within hours of the appeals court ruling, Naughton was released by federal prosecutors on $100,000 bail. Despite the fact that he was, as the Times acknowledged, convicted of “possessing pictures of actual children,” the decision was made to release him “until the impact of the court's ruling can be sorted out,” illustrating the significant undermining of existing law that the court ruling portends.

Closely associated with child pornography is, of course, child abuse. It should go without saying that all kids used in child pornography are abused children, their abuse recorded on film and tape for the depraved enjoyment of other child abusers. Also closely associated with child pornography is the always controversial issue of 'missing children.'

There is considerable debate as to whether there is a problem in this country with missing children. Some claim that 200,000 or more children disappear without a trace every year. Others steadfastly maintain that numbers such as those are grossly inflated, and that abduction of children by strangers with bad intent is actually quite rare.

The problem is that nobody really knows for sure, since the FBI - America's compiler of crime statistics - doesn't bother to keep track. As Ted Gunderson, former FBI station chief for Los Angeles, has stated: “The FBI has an accurate count on the number of automobiles stolen every year. It knows the number of homicides, rapes and robberies, but the FBI has no idea of the number of children that disappear every year. They simply do not ask for the statistics.”

Many believe that the numbers aren't compiled because the FBI doesn't want to know – or more accurately, the FBI doesn't want the American people to know. What is known though is that reports of child abuse have skyrocketed. Between 1963 and 1988, reported cases of child abuse rose from 150,000 to 2,000,000 per year, a 1300% increase in just a quarter-century.

Child abuse may in fact be the most prevalent - and possibly the most significant - crime in American society, given that it provides the breeding ground for so much of the more visible crime plaguing Western culture. As Thomas reports: “over 90 percent of the teenage prison population are now victims of child abuse,” and that population is growing rapidly.

In the wake of this rising tide, the Los Angeles Times reported in March 2001 that: “President [a clearly inappropriate use of the word] Bush's budget will trim a program aimed at preventing child abuse and cut some child care spending … A child abuse prevention program will see an 18% cut.” That money will apparently be much better spent on handing out tax breaks for the wealthy and building missile defense shields … but here I digress.

Author and e-zine editor Robert Sterling has written of what he refers to as “a pattern of trivialization of child molestation evidence” that seems to characterize high-profile media stories. He points out, for instance, that in the highly publicized Woody Allen and Mia Farrow child custody case, all the attention was focused on Allen’s illicit romance with Soon-yi Previn.

Almost entirely ignored in the media coverage was the fact that Allen was also charged with molesting his own seven-year-old adopted daughter, Dylan. While the press dismissed those allegations as unfounded and unworthy of reporting, Sterling notes that “Connecticut state authorities, based on the testimony of Dylan and others, have stated that they do believe Woody did molest her, but decided not to prosecute anyway,” allegedly to spare the child any further trauma.

Sterling also takes note of the “case of the Menendez brothers, who, after admitting to murdering their parents, painfully revealed that they were ruthlessly abused and molested by them over the years.” Their claims were never fully investigated and the boys were “viciously demonized for trying to escape the murder charges and accused of making up their abuse,” though there was in fact clear evidence of that abuse, according to a private investigator who worked on the case.

Also noted is the kid-gloves treatment afforded Michael Jackson when he was charged with molestation: “even though the accusations against him are widely believed to be true, [they] are merely passed off with a laugh among other smirking monologue jokes on Jay Leno.” And of course, though unmentioned by Sterling, sister LaToya was ridiculed by the media when she came forward with stories about the sexual abuse suffered by the Jackson kids at the hands of their father.

Sterling references other cases as well, including the over-hyped au-pair trial in which evidence of prior abuse of the child by his parents was consistently ignored, and the Susan Smith case, in which the media refused to consider whether her own severe childhood abuse could have been a factor in the murder of her children, despite the fact that her father admitted to the chronic abuse.

Coupled with the fact that the press have consistently downplayed the occurrence of child molestation is the equally disturbing fact that that very same media have actively promoted the sexualization of children – a trend that has been greatly accelerated in recent years, and which serves to legitimize pedophilia.

Taking note of the proliferation of young teen - and even pre-teen - sex symbols, Tom Junod wrote in Esquire that: “the entire culture is besotted with the erotic promise of teenage girls … The lure of jailbait now supplies the erotic energy to a popular culture desperate for what’s new, what’s young, what’s alive.”

The Junod article is, by the way, a profile of Greg Dark, one half of the former ‘Dark Brothers’ – notorious purveyors of dark-themed, occult-tinged porno films. Dark is rather noteworthy for openly peddling child pornography, in that many of his films featured a very young Traci Lords, who began working with the Dark Brothers at the age of thirteen.

But Dark has put those days long behind him. He is now working comfortably in the mainstream. And he is no longer marketing teen sexuality. No, now he is creating music videos … for Britney Spears, Mandy Moore and the pre-pubescent Leslie Carter (sister of Aaron Carter and Back Street Boy Nick Carter). That is, according to Dark, a completely different line of work.

Some interesting facts about Dark emerge in the Esquire profile. It is revealed, for instance, that he was raised by a satanist father. Dark’s father “used to read to Gregory from the works of Aleister Crowley, the noted satanist, when Gregory was very young.” His father’s collection of ‘black magick’ books is one of Dark’s most cherished possessions.

Also revealed is that Dark is a master manipulator, as he candidly admits to his interviewer: “And the thing is, I like manipulating people. I’m comfortable manipulating people. I’m good at it.” Junod adds that, during Dark’s porno days, he “asked people to do things … curious things … and they did them.” Such is the nature of the man crafting the images of America’s teen sex symbols and marketing them to millions of pre-teen fans ... but here again I digress.

Also closely associated with child pornography is the issue of child prostitution, which - make no mistake about it - is a booming business. A&E’s “Investigative Reports” has noted that law enforcement figures indicate that there are currently some 600,000 child prostitutes working in the United States and Canada and that $5 billion a year is generated worldwide by pimp organizations specializing in the exploitation of children.

A&E also reported that, throughout North America, there is a “growing use of children in the sex trade,” and that young boys make up 51% of that trade. The FBI has, of course, turned a blind eye; for the last quarter-century, “federal prosecutions of major pimp operations have been virtually nonexistent.” As Dr. Lois Lee has noted: “It’s not a high priority with the FBI to go after kids that are being transported across state lines. It’s really a disgrace.”

Dr. Lee is the founder of “Children of the Night,” an organization devoted to helping repair the shattered lives of child sex trade victims. Her facility, said to be the only one of its kind in the world, has seen 10,000 kids pass through its doors. Fully ninety percent of them have suffered a lifetime of abuse – first at home, and later on the streets and alleys of America’s big cities. Most of them suffered their first abuse before the age of three.

Many of these victims are runaways recruited from small towns across the country, then brought to prime child prostitution markets such as Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Once there, they have an average life span of just seven years; many of them never reach adulthood. For as long as they survive though, they reap enormous financial rewards for their pimps. The younger the child, the more popular they are with the ‘Johns,’ and therefore the more profitable for their exploiters.

All of this would tend to indicate that America is in something of a state of denial about the proliferation of child molestation, child prostitution, and child pornography rings, which constitute a vast underground in this country. But does this pedophilic underground extend into the halls of power? Is America's political, corporate and military elite hiding a particularly dirty little secret from the American people? A secret that, if exposed, could shatter America's cherished political and economic institutions and bring the house of cards crashing down?

Consider the case of Craig Spence, a behind-the-scenes Republican powerbroker in Washington. In June of 1989, the Washington Times published a story that sent shock waves across Capitol Hill. It seems that Spence had been operating a call-boy ring that supplied young boys, some of them very young boys, to the Washington elite of both political parties.

It was rumored that a list of influential clients ran to some 200 names, and some of them were publicly identified. On the list were such names as former CIA director William Casey, former prosecutor and current cable ‘news’ talking-head Joseph diGenova, nominally liberal Congressman Barney Frank, political activist/propagandist Phyllis Schlafly, and former Attorney General John Mitchell – who once co-hosted a party with Spence.””””

Now that you’ve read the full article, you may be as appalled as are. The answer is for us to do business. Make money and use it to fracture the substructure. Superstructure will come tumbling down. Sounds familiar to something the Talmudic Jews master minded, and the Muslims were falsely accused of doing?

Mohammad Karim Ahmadzai,
For Earth Projects, and RICE


Let us try to destabilise the Talmudic Jewish paedomasonic means of total control and anal domination. Google, are now publishing all of our recent posts, but for the backdated omissions by Google, a comprehensive record can be followed in our Facebook site.

Linguistic, cultural, historic and religious barriers must not be allowed to jaundice the perception of the reader from grasping core issues.

Preface for continuity so that we do not forget Teresa Cooper, Julian Grail (Plymouth City Council) and the government involvement.

For readers new to the blog, we recommend you research and Google the following:

‘Dunblane conspiracy’, ‘the Bryn Alyn Welsh Homes scandals’, and then Google ‘Freemasons sexual abuse conspiracies’. The information will be staggering.

Some previously visited sites have been deleted/cleaned up/hidden from scrutiny. For an insight, new comers to the blog are advised to read from post number 244 onwards.

Every council in the country is run by the Freemasons, answerable to one man in position of authority. That man was Sandy Bruce Lockhart, but now replaced by homosexual Simon Fuller. There is an overt Masonic Lodge in every town, but also covert (secret) Masonic houses in every town, where ritual abuse takes place.

It must be noted that Lord Nigel Lawson and Harvey Proctor have been exposed by our own team members of taking active parts in the ritual anal domination/rape of young children. The rarity of exposure of the individuals involved is due to the secrecy of the system, and control over the dominated children who don’t speak out.

In all fairness, we have given ample opportunities for the likes of Lord Lawson, Lord Mandelson, Lord George Robertson, Tony (Marilyn) Blair, his mentor Peter Selby Right, David Cameron and Michael Howard to come forward and talk, but the silence is deafening!!!

The physical evidence and symptoms of sexual abuse are obvious to our team members. We know, from experience, that the bags around and under the eyes are evidence of anal penetration as young children. This may also be relevant to adult anal penetration depending on the size of the implement used. We now predict that in the near future, plastic surgery will be used in an attempt to hide this evidence and symptoms.

Take a look at the MPs, the House of Lords, the media in particular, and political commentators on TV. How many have the give away signs, of not only the pressure induced bags under the eyes, but also other physical traits that we will divulge at a later date. We know of a multiple number of anally abused victims that show not only the bags under the eyes but various other physical symptoms which correlate.

From our research and experience, only about one in ten paedophiles are exposed. Reference to a previous blog post, where approximately 450 paedophiles abused 67,000 children!! If one paedophile abuses 20 children, how many paedophiles do you think will be created by the paedophiles acts?? ‘Official figures’ suggest that 50% of the abused children become paedophiles. So from 67,000 abused children, you may very well have ended up with 33,500 paedophiles among you!!! And they are not being exposed and caught!!!

Bank details for your contributions:

Account holder’s name: Mohammad Karim Ahmadzai
Bank: Halifax Building Society, PO Box 101, Halifax HX3 0TA, UK
Account number: 00043901
24 hour telephone banking: Phone number +44 08457 20 30 40
Online banking


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home