Sunday, 19 April 2009

911 The Same Type Conspiracy As The Cuban Project "Operation Northwoods"?! Why Not?!

Post number 301

Hammurabi applies

Preface for continuity so that we do not forget Teresa Cooper, Julian Grail and the government involvement. The actual post number 301 begins 8 paragraphs below.

Marilyn (Tony Blair), Peter Mandleson, Lord George Robertson, and Jack Straw should be arrested by Edwina Currie of the Martial Law government based on the strength of the revelations in post number 287. The foursome will answer charges on paedophilia to do with the Dunblane massacre. The 60 million Britons do not accept the 100 years secrecy Blair imposed on the Dunblane secrets. The public will bust it open and try Blair, Mandleson, and Straw for protecting Robertson and Mandleson and toe the Bush line to take Britain to the illegal war in Iraq. The CIA blackmailed Blair.

These proceedings of Paedophilia and related topics that started with post number 244, (my recorded delivery letter of 7 July 2007 to scum bag Tony Blair that remains unanswered to date), will continue until I achieve results and get closer to my dry cleaning aims.

We will remain on this topic like a broken record until Glastonbury and until we expose the likes of the Pimp of the establishment, Chris Tarrant, Lord Nigel Lawson, and the modern day Joseph Mengele, Dr Liam Donaldson. The trouble with an occasional publication now and then in the Times, The Mirror and the Daily Telegraph is that they are one off articles with no follow ups. We should remain on course, and build up momentum.

Bigger Freemasons and affiliates exposed as result of the last few posts are: Claire Rainer, Agony uncle (after the operation. Seriously, with that voice, she may be wearing a dildo on a belt underneath her skirt!) and the head of PALS, now Denise Robertson MBE, Piers Morgan (with a little reservation but not much), Nick Griffin of the BNP, Esther Rantzen, Police Chiefs Otter and Weber of Devon and Cornwall, Professor Sir Roger Scruten Philosopher, Oxford don, and author of 30 books – probably all crap and sold 10 copies of each to family and friends. You’ve got to laugh, even in this hour of misery.

Others who must be brought to face justice are Yolande Lindridge, Judge Neglinnan/Nelligan (?) of Plymouth/Devon, Judge Wildblood of Plymouth, Anne Mitchell the fake and mad social worker, the government back bencher/head of Plymouth SS, Sandy Bruce Lockhart, Simon Fuller (?), The housing associations, and the entire leaderships of Plymouth and Devon Councils.

Don’t forget the sweet Teresa Cooper. Buy her books “Locked Up”, “Pindown” and another. Pester Jemila Dodge of Kent County Council (Tel 01622 696265, Fax 01622 694383) and seek justice. Hound Bishop Michael Nazir Ali of Rochester and enquire why he ignored Teresa’s desperate Plight.

Seek justice for my team members, parents of the 3 old in Plymouth whose 3 year old daughter (with teeth pulled out) is subjected to giving oral sex to the leadership of Plymouth City Council.

Investigate the case of Julian Grail, Planning Officer with the Plymouth City Council who jumped off the Tamar Bridge and killed himself. Was he “pushed” after exposing the sexual abuse of children and sex trafficking by Plymouth City Council?

New comers to the blog are advised to read from post number 244 onwards.

Post number 301:

Does the following excerpt copied from www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwood.html classify as a conspiracy? Seems to ring a bell in relation to 911. Here, in Operation Northwoods, the USA wanted to blow up a civilian jetliner in Cuban air space and blame it on the Cuban so that the US could invade their country. Could the US not have blown up the twin towers to invade Afghanistan and Iraq? The US did just that and the fictitious War on Terror world wide was launched.

“””The following excerpts are taken from the original 15-page US Government TOP SECRET document, "Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba [including cover memoranda], March 13, 1962," available at the National Security Archive website in pdf format at the following link: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf (local pdf copy) (if you don't have it, download Adobe Acrobat Reader to view pdf formatted files).

1) The introductory text entry point for this document is at Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962 (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/) and is reproduced here:
In his new exposé of the National Security Agency entitled Body of Secrets, author James Bamford highlights a set of proposals on Cuba by the Joint Chiefs of Staff codenamed OPERATION NORTHWOODS. This document, titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba" was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods.

2) Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals -- part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose -- included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," including "sink[ing] a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated)," faking a Cuban air force attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a "Remember the Maine" incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage. Bamford himself writes that Operation Northwoods "may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government." “””

More memoranda of articles are found on the site cited above. Furthermore, we have reason to believe that some of the IRA atrocities were master minded by the British Establishment and carried out by the IRA on their behalf.

Also, note the following from http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosives_evidence_timeline.html. Building 7’s downing was announced by the BBC live report from the site 2 hours before the building actually collapsed. How did the BBC know that?

Meanwhile, George W. Bush in a pre arranged set up showed himself not involved in master minding the 911 tragedy by posing in a school classroom reading a book to the children.

Look again, and you will see the book was held upside down. He wasn’t reading any thing to the children at all. His mind was elsewhere thinking how smoothly his evil scheme may have been implemented


"""Jim Hoffman
Version 1.0, April 3, 2009

Introduction

i) The obliteration of the Twin Towers was the centerpiece of the event that launched the 'War on Terror'. Shocking on multiple levels, the events were especially traumatic for Americans, being the first bombing on the US mainland in modern history that killed thousands of people -- civilians -- in one day. Given the collective psychological trauma of the attack, it is not surprising that public discourse would remain free of observations that the destruction of the Twin Towers bore obvious features of controlled demolitions. Early candid public remarks by reporters and demolition experts where quickly retracted or forgotten. Passage of the USA PATRIOT Act and the invasion of Afghanistan would proceed apace.

ii) By 2003 the United States had occupations of two countries, and an international reputation as a rogue state all resting on a shaky-at-best collapse theory whose principal alternative hypothesis -- controlled demolition with pre-planted pyrotechnics -- had not even been tested by the straightforward forensic analysis of debris for residues of such materials.

iii) By early 2009, the residue testing that NIST refused to do had been done by independent researchers, and reported on in a peer-reviewed chemistry journal. Small bi-layered chips, found consistently in dust samples, have layers of red nano-engineered material that is clearly aluminothermic: it has sub-micron-diameter particles of largely of elemental aluminum, and smaller crystalline grains of primarily Fe2O3. On ignition, the chips produce temperatures above the melting point of iron, leaving tiny iron droplets matching the residues of commercial thermite pyrotechnics.

iv) The publication of these results should be astounding to anyone who uncritically accepted the collapse explanations in TV documentaries and never looked seriously at any of the several bodies of evidence for controlled demolition.

v) The NIST investigation, having posted its Final Report with its absurd Building 7 joint-breaking-thermal-expansion theory in late 2008 and FAQ by Christmas, closed its doors before the independent researchers published their findings of active aluminothermic materials in WTC dust in a mainstream scientific journal; but not before they publicized findings of aluminothermic residues in the same dust samples; and not before they extracted from NIST a series of public statements, in press conferences and in written responses to requests for correction (RFCs), about the conduct of their inquiry into the cause of the skyscrapers' total destruction.
ABEL: ... what about that letter where NIST said it didn’t look for evidence of explosives?
NEUMAN: Right, because there was no evidence of that.
ABEL: But how can you know there’s no evidence if you don’t look for it first?
NEUMAN: If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting your time....
--Conversation between a reporter and a NIST spokesperson. source

vi) As a result, NIST spokespersons are on the record saying they did not test for pyrotechnics, and offering rationales for failing to perform such tests. Those rationale -- or rationalizations -- summarized toward the end of this essay, include the assertion that testing for pyrotechnics "would not necessarily have been conclusive". That is partially true: failing to find pyrotechnic residues wouldn't rule out demolition, since demolition might have been implemented using an untraceable fuel such as hydrogen gas. But finding abundant and distributed pyrotechnic explosive residues would conclusively favor demolition -- particularly given the persuasive deductive arguments showing that the features of the buildings' destruction are incompatable with a purely gravity-driven collapse.

vii) The following timeline is narrowly focused on the emergence of public evidence indicating the use of aluminothermic pyrotechnics, ranging from incendiaries to high-explosives, in the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7, and on the way official bodies -- particular NIST -- treated that evidence."""

Mohammad Karim Ahmadzai,
Team Leader, Earth Projects

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home